SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 0.5 mM BC059385 U-15N/13C, 10 mM deuterated sodium acetate, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM Dithiothreitol, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 106 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.0 AMBIENT 298
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 0.5 mM BC059385 U-15N/13C, 10 mM deuterated sodium acetate, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM Dithiothreitol, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 106 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.0 AMBIENT 298
3 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC) 0.5 mM BC059385 U-15N/13C, 10 mM deuterated sodium acetate, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM Dithiothreitol, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 106 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.0 AMBIENT 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker DRX 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1144 NOE CONSTRAINTS ( 294 INTRA, 141 SEQUENTIAL, 216 MEDIUM and 493 LONG RANGE CONSTRAINTS) AND 115 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 collection 3.5 XwinNMR Bruker
2 processing 2004 NMRPipe Delagio,F. et al.
3 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Eccles, C.; Guntert, P.; Billeter, M.; Wuthrich, K.
4 data analysis 1.1.0 SPSCAN R.W. Glaser
5 data analysis 2.1 GARANT C. Bartels
6 structural calculation 2.1 CYANA Guntert, P.
7 refinement 2.9.3 Xplor-NIH SCHWIETERS, C.D., KUSZEWSKI, J.J., TJANDRA, N., CLORE, G.M.