SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing THE STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED USING THE SIMULATED ANNEALING PROTOCOL OF NILGES ET AL. (1988) FEBS LETT. 229, 129-136 USING THE PROGRAM X-PLOR 3.1 (BRUNGER) MODIFIED TO INCORPORATE COUPLING CONSTANT (GARRETT ET AL. (1984) J. MAGN. RESON. SERIES B 104, 99-103) AND CARBON CHEMICAL SHIFT (KUSZEWSKI ET AL. (1995) J. MAGN. RESON. SERIES B 106, 92-96) RESTRAINTS, AND T1/T2 RESTRAINTS (TJANDRA ET AL. NATURE STRUCT. BIOL. 4, 443-449, 1997). IN THIS ENTRY THE LAST COLUMN REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE RMS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL SIMULATED ANNEALING STRUCTURES AND THE MEAN COORDINATE POSITIONS. THE LAST COLUMN IN THE INDIVIDUAL SA STRUCTURES HAS NO MEANING. BEST FITTING TO GENERATE THE AVERAGE STRUCTURE IS WITH RESPECT TO RESIDUES 1 - 246 (RESIDUES 250 - 259 ARE DISORDERED IN SOLUTION). THE DIFFUSION AXIS IS REPRESENTED BY A LINE CONNECTING THE FOLLOWING POINTS: P1 99.732 -1.172 2.902 P2 101.246 -1.242 3.113 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria REGULARIZED MEAN STRUCTURE
Conformers Calculated Total Number 30
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model ()
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement 3.1 X-PLOR BRUNGER
2 structure solution ABOVE) X-PLOR (SEE ABOVE) ?