SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 0.6 mM delta subunit N-terminal domain U-13C,15N; 0.9 mM alpha subunit N-terminal peptide; 10 mM Na,K phosphate, pH 7.2, 3mM NaN3, 0.1 mM EDTA; 93% H20, 7% D20 50 mM 93% H20, 7% D20 7.2 ambient 295
2 13C/12C filtered 2-D NOESY 0.6 mM delta subunit N-terminal domain U-13C,15N; 0.9 mM alpha subunit N-terminal peptide; 10 mM Na,K phosphate, pH 7.2, 3mM NaN3, 0.1 mM EDTA; 93% H20, 7% D20 50 mM 93% H20, 7% D20 7.2 ambient 295
3 12C/12C filtered 2-D NOESY 0.6 mM delta subunit N-terminal domain U-13C,15N; 0.9 mM alpha subunit N-terminal peptide; 10 mM Na,K phosphate, pH 7.2, 3mM NaN3, 0.1 mM EDTA; 93% H20, 7% D20 50 mM 93% H20, 7% D20 7.2 ambient 295
4 14N/12C filtered 2-D NOESY 0.6 mM delta subunit N-terminal domain U-13C,15N; 0.9 mM alpha subunit N-terminal peptide; 10 mM Na,K phosphate, pH 7.2, 3mM NaN3, 0.1 mM EDTA; 93% H20, 7% D20 50 mM 93% H20, 7% D20 7.2 ambient 295
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
distance geometry; simulated annealing; molecular dynamics rms difference of non-H atoms 1.114, for the backbone atoms 0.6174 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria averaged minimized structure
Conformers Calculated Total Number 10
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model ? (minimized average structure)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 structure solution 3.8 X-PLOR AT Brunger
2 data analysis 98 Felix Accelrys
3 refinement 3.8 X-PLOR AT Brunger
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback