SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 NOESY ? 3.7 ? 303
2 CLEANTOCSY ? 3.7 ? 303
3 DQFCOSY ? 3.7 ? 303
4 HSQC ? 3.7 ? 303
5 ECOSY ? 3.7 ? 303
6 HMQCJ ? 3.7 ? 303
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AMX500 500
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
DISTANCE GEOMETRY SIMULATED ANNEALING THE X-PLOR (R6)1/6 NOE POTENTIAL WAS USED FOR NOE'S INVOLVING NON-STEREOSPECIFICALLY ASSIGNED METHYL, METHYLENE, AND AROMATIC PROTONS. NO ATTRACTIVE POTENTIALS WERE USED IN CALCULATING THE STRUCTURES. THE VAN DER WAALS CUTOFF USED FOR THE X-PLOR REPEL FUNCTION WAS 0.75 ANGSTROMS. AFTER DISTANCE GEOMETRY AND REGULARIZATION, EACH STRUCTURE WAS SUBJECTED TO ONE ROUND OF SIMULATED ANNEALING FROM 2000K TO 100K OVER 2000 STEPS. THIS IS THE AVERAGE OF 29 STRUCTURES MINIMIZED USING ONLY REPULSIVE POTENTIALS. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria NO NOE VIOLATIONS > 0.4 ANGSTROMS, NO ANGLE VIOLATION > 5 DEG
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model ()
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement ? X-PLOR BRUNGER
2 structure solution ? X-PLOR ?