SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_13C-separated_NOESY G311 mutant protein, 0.1 M KPi, pH7.0, ~0.6 M GuHCl. 0.1M 0.1 M KPi, pH7.0, ~0.6 M GuHCl. 7.0 ambient 275
2 3D_15N-separated_NOESY G311 mutant protein, 0.1 M KPi, pH7.0, ~0.6 M GuHCl. 0.1M 0.1 M KPi, pH7.0, ~0.6 M GuHCl. 7.0 ambient 275
3 3D HNCACB, 3D HNCO, 3DCBCACONH, 3D HBHA(CBCACO)NH, 3D (H)C(CO)NH-TOCSY, H(CCO)NH-TOCSY, 2D TOCSY, 2D-CBHD, 2DCBHE, 2D TOCSY G311 mutant protein, 0.1 M KPi, pH7.0, ~0.6 M GuHCl. 0.1M 0.1 M KPi, pH7.0, ~0.6 M GuHCl. 7.0 ambient 275
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
CNS 1.1 simulated annealing 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria The submitted conformer models are those with the fewest number of constraint violations.
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 collection 2.5 XwinNMR Bruker Co.
2 processing . NMRPipe Frank Delaglio Stephan Grzeiek, Guang Zhu, Geerten W. Vuister, John Pfeifer, and Ad Bax
3 data analysis 3 Sparky T. D. Goddard and D. G. Kneller
4 structure solution 1.1 CNS A.T.Brunger, P.D.Adams, G.M.Clore, W.L.Delano, P.Gros, R.W.Grosse-Kunstleve, J.-S.Jiang, J.Kuszewski, M.Nilges, N.S.Pannu, R.J.Read, L.M.Rice, T.Simonson, G.L.Warren
5 refinement 1.1 CNS A.T.Brunger, P.D.Adams, G.M.Clore, W.L.Delano, P.Gros, R.W.Grosse-Kunstleve, J.-S.Jiang, J.Kuszewski, M.Nilges, N.S.Pannu, R.J.Read, L.M.Rice, T.Simonson, G.L.Warren