SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 0.6mM 13C/15N-MDM2; 3.5mM inhibitor; 50mM d13-MES; 150mM KCl; 50mM d10-DTT; 1.5mM NaN3 50mM d13-MES; 150mM KCl; 50mM d10-DTT; 1.5mM NaN3 92% H2O, 8% D2O 7.0 ambient 293
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 0.6mM 13C/15N-MDM2; 3.5mM inhibitor; 50mM d13-MES; 150mM KCl; 50mM d10-DTT; 1.5mM NaN3 50mM d13-MES; 150mM KCl; 50mM d10-DTT; 1.5mM NaN3 92% H2O, 8% D2O 7.0 ambient 293
3 2D 13C/15N-filtered NOESY 0.6mM 13C/15N-MDM2; 3.5mM inhibitor; 50mM d13-MES; 150mM KCl; 50mM d10-DTT; 1.5mM NaN3 50mM d13-MES; 150mM KCl; 50mM d10-DTT; 1.5mM NaN3 92% H2O, 8% D2O 7.0 ambient 293
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Varian INOVA 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing Structure calculations utilized 1169 NOE-based distance constraints, of which 54 were intermolecular; 176 dihedral angle constraints; and 48 hydrogen bond constraints. The piperazinyl moiety of the inhibitor gave no NOEs, hence the positions of its atoms are not known and the stereochemistry is not rigorously established. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with acceptable covalent geometry,structures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number 42
Conformers Submitted Total Number 18
Representative Model 4 (fewest violations)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 processing 2000 Felix Hare et al.
2 data analysis 5.0.3 NMRView Johnson and Blevins
3 structure solution 2000.1 CNX Brunger et al.
4 refinement 2000.1 CNX Brunger et al.