SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D 15N-NOESY 1mM WR33 U-15N,13C; 20mM NaH2PO4, 50mM NaCl, 10mM DTT, 0.02% azide 50 mM NaCl 95% H20, 5% D2O, PH 6.5 6.5 ambient 293
2 3D 13C-NOESY 1mM WR33 U-15N,13C; 20mM NaH2PO4, 50mM NaCl, 10mM DTT, 0.02% azide 50 mM NaCl 95% H20, 5% D2O, PH 6.5 6.5 ambient 293
3 2D 15N,1H HSQC 1mM WR33 U-15N,13C; 20mM NaH2PO4, 50mM NaCl, 10mM DTT, 0.02% azide 50 mM NaCl 95% H20, 5% D2O, PH 6.5 6.5 ambient 293
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
torsion angle dynamics THE STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL 729 CONFORMATIONALLY-RESTRICTING NOE-DERIVED DISTANCE CONSTRAINTS, 260 DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS, AND 50 HYDROGEN BOND CONSTRAINTS (9.3 CONSTRAINTS PER RESIDUE; 1.2 LONG-RANGE CONSTRAINTS PER RESIDUE). STRUCTURE DETERMINATION WAS PERFORMED ITERATIVELY USING AUTOSTRUCTURE (DYANA). THE 10 STRUCTURES WITH THE LOWEST TARGET FUNCTION WERE FURTHER REFINED BY RESTRAINED MOLECULAR DYNAMICS/ENERGY MINIMIZATION IN EXPLICIT WATER (CNS). THE UNSTRUCTURED N- (1 to 17) AND C- (121 to 125) TERMINAL REGIONS OF THE MOLECULE ARE OMITTED FROM THIS DEPOSITION. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 56
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model ()
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 collection 6.1B VNMR ?
2 processing 2.1 NMRPipe ?
3 data analysis 3.106 Sparky ?
4 data analysis 1.11.0 AutoAssign ?
5 data analysis 2.1 TALOS ?
6 refinement 1.5 DYANA Guntert
7 refinement 2.1.0 AutoStructure Huang, Montelione
8 refinement 1.1 CNS Brunger
9 data analysis 1.0 PSVS Bhattacharya, Montelione
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback