SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 2mM Microcin J25 U-13C,15N; 99.5% CD3OH, 0.5% H2O NA 99.5% CD3OH, 0.5% H2O . ambient 298
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 2mM Microcin J25 U-13C,15N; 99.5% CD3OH, 0.5% H2O NA 99.5% CD3OH, 0.5% H2O . ambient 298
3 HNHA 2mM Microcin J25 U-13C,15N; 99.5% CD3OH, 0.5% H2O NA 99.5% CD3OH, 0.5% H2O . ambient 298
4 HNCACB 2mM Microcin J25 U-13C,15N; 99.5% CD3OH, 0.5% H2O NA 99.5% CD3OH, 0.5% H2O . ambient 298
5 CBCAcoNH 2mM Microcin J25 U-13C,15N; 99.5% CD3OH, 0.5% H2O NA 99.5% CD3OH, 0.5% H2O . ambient 298
6 ? 2mM Microcin J25 U-13C,15N; 99.5% CD3OH, 0.5% H2O NA 99.5% CD3OH, 0.5% H2O . ambient 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing The ensemble of structures is based on a total of 198 conformationally restraining constraints, 179 are NOE-derived distance constraints, 13 are dihedral angle constraints, 6 are distance constraints from hydrogen bonds. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 60
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 processing 0.8 AutoProc Bayro, M.J.; Monleon, D.; Baran, M.C.; Sahota, G.; Paranji, R.; Moseley, H.N.B.; Aramini, J.M.; Swapna, G.V.T.; Montelione, G.T.
2 processing 1.4 NMRPipe Delaglio, F.; Grzesiek, S.; Vuister, G.; Zhu, G.; Pfeifer, J.; Bax, A.
3 structure solution 1.1.2 AutoStructure Huang, Y.J., Tejero, R., Montelione, G.T.
4 structure solution 1.5 DYANA Guntert, P.; Mumenthaler, C.; Wuthrich, K.
5 refinement 3.25 PdbStat Tejero, R.; Montelione, G.T.