SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 NOESY ? 6.5 ? 303
2 TOCSY ? 6.5 ? 303
3 3D TOCSY-NOESY ? 6.5 ? 303
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AMX600 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED WITH A MODIFIED VERSION OF X-PLOR (SEE JRNL REFERENCE FOR DETAILS) WITH A SIMULATED ANNEALING PROTOCOL. AN AUTOMATED PROCEDURE (ARIA) WAS USED TO AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGN AND AUGMENT AN INITIAL LIST OF 568 MANUALLY SELECTED RESTRAINTS, FROM PEAK LISTS FROM TWO H2O NOESY SPECTRA (30 AND 80 MS). 20 STRUCTURES WERE ITERATIVELY REFINED, AND THE NOE DATA RE-ASSIGNED ON THE BASIS OF THE 7 LOWEST ENERGY STRUCTURES IN EACH ITERATION. EIGHT REFINEMENT/ASSIGNMENT CYCLES WERE RUN, PLUS TWO IN AN EXPLICIT SHELL OF WATER. THE FINAL LIST OF RESTRAINTS CONTAINED 1328 UNAMBIGUOUS RESTRAINTS AND 486 AMBIGUOUS RESTRAINTS WITH MAXIMALLY 5 ASSIGNMENT POSSIBILITIES. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria LOWEST ENERGY
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 50
Representative Model ()
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement ? X-PLOR BRUNGER
2 structure solution ? X-PLOR ?
3 structure solution ? ARIA ?
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback