Home
About
Browse
Covid-19
Organism Classification
Alphafold Collection
Virus Classification
Indian Data
Documentation
Contact
Search Type
PDB Id
Uniprot Id
Source Organism
Host Organism
Protein Name
Method
Summary
Structure Feature
Experiment
Ligands & Environment
1IEH
pdb_00001ieh
10.2210/pdb1ieh/pdb
Download file
FASTA
PDB
MMCIF
Binary MMCIF
XML
Structure Factors
Full Validation Report
Validation File (XML)
Validation File (CIF)
FASTA Zipped(.gz)
PDB Zipped(.gz)
MMCIF Zipped(.gz)
Binary MMCIF Zipped(.gz)
Structure Factors Zipped(.gz)
Validation File Zipped (.xml.gz)
Validation File Zipped (.cif.gz)
SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
Experiment
Type
Sample Contents
Ionic Strength
Solvent
pH
Pressure
Temprature (K)
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer
Manufacturer
Model
Field Strength
1
Bruker
AVANCE
800
NMR Refinement
Method
Details
Software
simulated annealing using torsion angle and cartesian dynamics
NO MANUAL ASSIGNMENTS OF NOE PEAKS WERE INITIALLY PERFORMED - THE GLOBAL FOLD OF THE PROTEIN WAS DETERMINED USING RESTRAINTS WITH LOW AMBIGUITY. THE SET OF GLOBAL FOLD STRUCTURES SERVED AS AN ASSIGNMENT FILTER TO REDUCE THE AMBIGUITY OF THE OTHER RESTRAINTS. THE RESTRAINT LIST AND STRUCTURES WERE FURTHER REFINED BY MANUALLY CHOOSING POSSIBILITIES FROM THE RESTRAINTS WITH LOW AMBIGUITY (BASED ON THE SPECTRA).
1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria
structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number
150
Conformers Submitted Total Number
10
Representative Model
1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#
Classification
Version
Software Name
Author
1
processing
?
NMRPipe
Frank Delaglio, Stephan Grzesiek, Ad Bax, Geerten W. Vuister, Guang Zhu, John Pfeifer
2
data analysis
4.1.2
NMRView
Bruce Johnson and Richard Blevins
3
structure solution
1.0
ARIA
J. Linge and M. Nilges
4
structure solution
1.0
CNS
AT Brunger, PD Adams, GM Clore, WL DeLano, P Gros, RW Grosse-Kunstleve, JS Jiang, J Kuszewski, M Nilges, NS Pannu, RJ Read, LM Rice, T Simonson, GL Warren
5
refinement
1.0
ARIA
Linge, Nilges
Feedback
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback
Submit