SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-SEPARATED_NOESY 1.2 MM [U-15N]APO-DCP, 50 MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER 50 mM PHOSPHATE 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.80 AMBIENT 298.00
2 3D_13C-SEPARATED_NOESY 1.2 MM [U-15N]APO-DCP, 50 MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER 50 mM PHOSPHATE 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.80 AMBIENT 298.00
3 2D 15N-FILTERED NOESY 1.2 MM [U-15N]APO-DCP, 50 MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER 50 mM PHOSPHATE 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.80 AMBIENT 298.00
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker DMX 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
torsion angle dynamics THE STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1582 NON-TRIVIAL UPPER-LIMIT DISTANCE CONSTRAINTS (332 LONG-RANGE, 560 MEDIUM-RANGE, 372 SEQUENTIAL AND 318 INTRARESIDUE), DERIVED FROM 3288 ASSIGNED NOES FROM 4 2D AND 3D SPECTRA. THIS CORRESPONDS TO AN AVERAGE OF 19.8 CONSTRAINTS/RESIDUE. NO ADDITIONAL CONSTRAINTS WERE INCLUDED. STRUCTURES WERE GENERATED USING THE ANNEAL FUNCTION OF THE PROGRAM DYANA 1.5, WITH 8000 TORSION ANGLE DYNAMICS STEPS FOR EACH STRUCTURE. THE AVERAGE DYANA TARGET FUNCTION FOR THE 30 CONFORMERS WAS 0.68 +/- 0.11. THE AVERAGE BACKBONE ATOMIC RMSD TO THE MEAN STRUCTURE FOR RESIDUES 4-81 IS 0.43 +/- 0.08 ANGSTROMS, AND 0.86 +/- 0.09 FOR ALL NON-HYDROGEN ATOMS (RESIDUES 4-81). 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria .
Conformers Calculated Total Number 1
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model 1 (minimized average structure)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement 1.5 DYANA PETER GUNTERT
2 processing 95 Felix MSI
3 processing ? NMRPipe Frank Delaglio, NIH
4 collection 2.3 XwinNMR Bruker
5 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Guntert
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback