SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 13C-HSQC-J-MODULATED 0.5 MM DUPLEX DNA, 40MM SODIUM PHOSPHATE, PH 7.0 40 mM ? 7.00 1 308.00
2 COSY 0.5 MM DUPLEX DNA, 40MM SODIUM PHOSPHATE, PH 7.0 40 mM ? 7.00 1 308.00
3 13C-HSQC-F1- COUPLED 0.5 MM DUPLEX DNA, 40MM SODIUM PHOSPHATE, PH 7.0 40 mM ? 7.00 1 308.00
4 15N-HSQC-F1- COUPLED 0.5 MM DUPLEX DNA, 40MM SODIUM PHOSPHATE, PH 7.0 40 mM ? 7.00 1 308.00
5 2D NOESY 0.5 MM DUPLEX DNA, 40MM SODIUM PHOSPHATE, PH 7.0 40 mM ? 7.00 1 308.00
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
SIMULATED ANNEALING IN TORSION ANGLE SPACE USING A SIXTH ORDER PREDICTOR-CORRECTOR METHOD WITH AUTOMATIC TIME STEP SELECTION (C. SCHWIETERS AND G.M. CLORE) THE STRUCTURE IS BASED ON A TOTAL OF 162 NOE, 48 DISTANCES FOR WATSON-CRICK HYDROGEN BONDS, AND 137 DIHEDRAL 137 TORSION ANGLE RESTRAINTS, 198 CH AND 10 NH ONE-BOND DIPOLAR COUPLING RESTRAINTS, AND 200 APPROXIMATE PROTON-PROTON DIPOLAR COUPLINGS. THE EXPERIMENTAL RESTRAINTS ARE THE SAME AS THOSE LISTED IN 1DUF. THE NON-BONDED CONTACTS ARE REPRESENTED BY A QUARTIC VAN DER WAALS REPULSION TERM AND A BASE-BASE POSITIONING DATABASE POTENTIAL OF MEAN FORCE. ALSO INCLUDED IS A TORSION ANGLE DATABASE POTENTIAL OF MEAN FORCE. IN THIS ENTRY THE SECOND TO LAST COLUMN REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE RMS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL SIMULATED ANNEALING STRUCTURES AND THE MEAN COORDINATE POSITIONS. MODEL 1 IS CALCULATED WITH NOE-DERIVED INTERPROTON DISTANCE RESTRAINTS, DIPOLAR COUPLING RESTRAINTS AND TORSION ANGLE RESTRAINTS. MODEL 2 IS CALCULATED WITH DIPOLAR COUPLING AND TORSION ANGLE RESTRAINTS. NO NOE-DERIVED INTERPROTON DISTANCE RESTRAINTS WERE EMPLOYED. STRUCTURAL STATISTICS: ---------------------------------------------------------- RESTRAINTS MODEL 1 MODEL 2 (# MODEL 1/# MODEL 2) (NOE + DIPOLARS) (DIPOLARS ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------------- RMS DEVIATIONS FROM EXPERIMENTAL RESTRAINTS INTERPROTON DISTANCES (A) 0.065 0.114 (162/0) TORSION ANGLES (DEG) 0 0 (137/137) ALL DIPOLAR COUPLINGS (HZ) 2.8 2.6 (408/408) RMS DEVIATIONS AND DIPOLAR COUPLING R-FACTORS FOR DIFFERENT CLASSES OF DIPOLAR COUPLINGS C-H RIBOSE (HZ/%) (94/94)* 2.27 (11.4%) 2.27 (11.4%) C-H RIBOSE (HZ/%) (64/64)** 5.62 (28.1%) 5.24 (26.2%) C-H BASE (HZ/%) (24/24)* 2.78 (13.9%) 2.81 (14.1%) C-H BASE (HZ/%) (12/12)** 1.89 (9.26%) 2.01 (10.0%) C-H METHYL (HZ/%) (4/4)* 0.98 (4.9%) 0.79 (4.0%) N-H IMINO (HZ/%) (10/10)* 1.56 (15.9%) 1.50 (15.2%) H-H ABSOLUTE VALUE (HZ) (126/126) 1.26 1.25 H-H SIGN KNOWN (HZ) (74/74) 0.93 0.88 RMS DEVIATIONS FROM IDEALIZED COVALENT GEOMETRY BONDS (A) 0.003 0.003 ANGLES (DEG) 0.897 0.925 IMPROPER TORSIONS (DEG) 0.296 0.106 ---------------------------------------------------------- * MEASURED WITH AN ACCURACY OF +/- 2 HZ ** MEASURED WITH AN ACCURACY OF +/- 4 HZ DIPOLAR COUPLING R-FACTOR = RATIO RMS DEVIATION BETWEEN OBSERVED AND CALCULATED VALUES AND EXPECTED RMS DEVIATION IF VECTORS ARE RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTED. THE LATTER IS GIVEN BY {2DA**2[4 + 3H**2]/5}1/2 WHERE DA IS THE MAGNITUDE OF THE AXIAL COMPONENT OF THE ALIGNMENT TENSOR AND H IS THE RHOMBICITY. (ONLY APPLIES TO FIXED LENGTH VECTORS). THE VALUES OF DA(CH), DA(NH) AND H ARE -16 HZ, -7.7 HZ AND 0.26, RESPECTIVELY. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria THE RESTRAINED REGULARIZED MEAN STRUCTURES
Conformers Calculated Total Number 40
Conformers Submitted Total Number 2
Representative Model ()
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement ? NIH VERSION OF XPLOR (AVAILABLE TO ACADEMIC USERS BY ANONYMOUS FTP AT PORTAL.NIDDK.NIH.GOV IN pub/clore/xplor_nih) CLORE, SCHWIETERS AND KUSZEWSKI. ADAPTED FROM XPLOR 3.841 by BRUNGER ET AL.
2 structure solution 1999.039.11.31 NMRPIPE 1.7 ?
3 structure solution 2.4 XwinNMR ?
4 structure solution 4.2.8 PIPP/CAPP ?