ISDA: 1GHT

SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment

Experiment	Type	Sample Contents	Ionic Strength	Solvent	pH	Pressure	Temprature (K)
1	3D_15N-SEPARATED_NOESY	0.002 M GAMMA DELTA RESOLVASE (1-105) U-15N; 0.020 M PHOSPHATE BUFFER, PH 6.5; 90% H2O, 10% D2O	1M	?	6.50	1	298.00
2	HNHA	0.002 M GAMMA DELTA RESOLVASE (1-105) U-15N; 0.020 M PHOSPHATE BUFFER, PH 6.5; 90% H2O, 10% D2O	1M	?	6.50	1	298.00
3	3D_13C-SEPARATED_ NOESY	0.002 M GAMMA DELTA RESOLVASE (1-105) U-15N; 0.020 M PHOSPHATE BUFFER, PH 6.5; 90% H2O, 10% D2O	1M	?	6.50	1	298.00

NMR Spectrometer Information

Spectrometer	Manufacturer	Model	Field Strength

NMR Refinement

Method	Details	Software
TORSION ANGLE DYNAMICS AND SIMULATED ANNEALING	THE NMR RESTRAINTS INCLUDED 2109 USEFUL NOE DETERMINED UPPER DISTANCE RESTRAINTS, 35 HYDROGEN BONDS, AND 297 TORSION ANGLE RESTRAINTS. STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED IN THE DYANA USING TORSION ANGLE DYNAMICS. THE CALCULATION STARTED WITH 200 RANDOMIZED STRUCTURES. THE 19 STRUCTURES WITH THE LOWEST TARGET FUNCTION WERE REFINED WITHIN XPLOR USING SIMULATED ANNEALING. THE 19 REFINED STRUCTURAL CONFORMERS DISPLAYED NO NOE VIOLATIONS >0.3 ANGSTROMS AND NO DIHEDRAL ANGLE VIOLATIONS >3 DEGREES. THE MINIMIZED AVERAGE STRUCTURE WAS CALCULATED FROM THE MEAN POSITIONS OF THE COORDINATES FOR THE 19 STRUCTURAL CONFORMERS AND WAS REFINED BY POWELL ENERGY MINIMIZATION IN XPLOR USING FULL NMR RESTRAINTS.	1

NMR Ensemble Information

Conformer Selection Criteria	?
Conformers Calculated Total Number	?
Conformers Submitted Total Number	1
Representative Model	()

Computation: NMR Software

#	Classification	Version	Software Name	Author
1	refinement	4.0	XPLOR	BRUNGER
2	structure solution	6.1	VNMR	?
3	structure solution	1.7	NMRPipe	?
4	structure solution	1.3.13	XEASY	?
5	structure solution	1.5	DYANA	?