SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D NOESY 1.5mM MutS U-98% 15N,13C; 11mM phosphate buffer; 11mM KXH3-XPO4 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 1 299
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 1.5mM MutS U-98% 15N,13C; 11mM phosphate buffer; 11mM KXH3-XPO4 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 1 299
3 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 1.5mM MutS U-98% 15N,13C; 11mM phosphate buffer; 11mM KXH3-XPO4 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 1 299
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Varian UNITYPLUS 500
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
distance geometry, simulated annealing, simulated annealing refinement, energy minimization The MutS structure models 1-15 are based on a total of 1792 restraints, 1553 are NOE-derived distance constraints, 184 dihedral angle restraints, 55 distance restraints from hydrogen bonds. Backbone dihedral angles Phi and Psi were obtained by employing TALOS software [G. Cornilescu et al., J. Biomol. NMR 1999, 13, 289-302]. Phi and Psi torsion angle restraints for the MutS residues 23-30, which form a "nascent" helix [M. Tollinger et al., Structure 1998, 6, 1021-1033], were not used in structure calculations for MutS models 16-30. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with acceptable covalent geometry,structures with favorable non-bond energy,structures with the least restraint violations,structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 30
Representative Model 16 (fewest violations)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio
2 data analysis 3.3 ANSIG Kraulis
3 structure solution 3.8.5.1 X-PLOR Bruenger
4 data analysis 98.040.21.02 TALOS Cornilescu
5 refinement 3.8.5.1 X-PLOR Bruenger
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback