SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 DQF-COSY ? 5.0 ? 303
2 HOHAHA ? 5.0 ? 303
3 NOESY ? 5.0 ? 303
4 PE-COSY; 1H-15N HSQC ? 5.0 ? 303
5 DOUBLE-DEPT ? 5.0 ? 303
6 2D-HMQC-HOHAHA ? 5.0 ? 303
7 2D-HMQC-NOESY ? 5.0 ? 303
8 HMQC-J ? 5.0 ? 303
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 JEOL JNM-GSX 500
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
HYBRID DISTANCE GEOMETRY-DYNAMICAL SIMULATED ANNEALING METHOD ? 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria AT FIRST, THE DEPOSITORS CARRIED OUT THE DISTANCE GEOMETRY CALCULATION BY STARTING FROM 55 INITIAL STRUCTURES. THIS CALCULATION RESULTED IN 41 SOLUTIONS, WHICH HAD CORRECT POLYPEPTIDE FOLDS EXCLUDING 14 MIRROR-IMAGE SUBSTRUCTURES. NEXT, THE DYNAMICAL SIMULATED ANNEALING CALCULATIONS WERE PERFORMED BY USING THESE 41 SUBSTRUCTURES. THE DISTANCE AND TORSION ANGLE VIOLATIONS OF THE 41 SOLUTIONS OBTAINED BY THE DYNAMICAL SIMULATED ANNEALING CALCULATIONS WERE SMALLER THAN 0.6 ANGSTROMS AND 27 DEGREES, RESPECTIVELY. THE DEPOSITORS SELECTED 10 SOLUTIONS THAT HAD THE DISTANCE AND TORSION ANGLE VIOLATIONS OF SMALLER THAN 0.5 ANGSTROMS AND 10 DEGREES, RESPECTIVELY.
Conformers Calculated Total Number 55
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model ()
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement ? X-PLOR BRUNGER
2 structure solution ? EMBOSS ?
3 structure solution ? X-PLOR ?